In February 2024, 4th year LLB student Madiha Waseem had the opportunity to shadow a solicitor in the civil courts and noted the first hand account of her experience. She hopes that her experience demonstrates the benefits of shadowing a qualified solicitor to other students and the role this can play in the transition from academia to practice.
It's one thing learning from books in a clinical lecture hall or dusty law library, but is quite another to observe this in an actual courtroom where the lights are bright and the stakes are no longer moot.
I am a 4th year LLB honours student at the University of Dundee Law School and I
require formal work experience or shadowing to include as part of my Diploma in
Legal Practice application. I asked people I knew if there were any opportunities and
I was put in touch with the Glasgow based Asian Lawyers’ Networking Group who
introduced me to Ahsan Mustafa, Solicitor at Nolans who practices in commercial
litigation and dispute resolution, particularly debt and asset recovery.
I met Ahsan in the foyer of Glasgow Sheriff Court, as I did not have a Law Society ID card, I had to go through security checks and had my bag scanned. This is a beautiful building with a stunning view of the River Clyde. The saying ‘justice flows like the river’ is very appropriate to this courthouse. Ahsan explained that the courthouse is a listed building and has around
2,000 visitors per day and is widely believed to be the busiest court in Europe. Even
as an experienced solicitor, it was clear that Ahsan was still in awe of the building
and its history. I suppose this is the kind of reverence you need for your craft in order
to endure what can be a very demanding profession.
The interior of the building is just like one would imagine a courthouse to be like in
literature and popular culture. There is a bustle and excitement mixed with solemnity
and there was a silent awareness of the reality that lives could be changed by the
sound of a gavel. There is marble everywhere and the place is literally like a maze.
Ahsan and I took the lift to the civil office on the second floor where Ahsan had a
good rapport with the clerical officials and was extremely polite. I found that they
knew him well and they told him the court number that his hearing would take place in. Ahsan explained that lawyers must respect all court staff. From the security guards standing at the entrance to the clerical staff, clerks of court, depute clerks and bar officers. Any bad
behaviour is likely to go back to the Sheriff. Solicitors are Officers of the Court who
have an important duty to the Court as well as to the their clients. The Law Society of
Scotland’s code of conduct for solicitors prohibits any intemperance, in any case. At
the end of the day, we are all working toward the same goal of having cases go
smoothly and run timeously. Ahsan was acutely aware of the competing pressures
the court staff were under and was very empathetic towards them.
As we made our way to the court room, Ahsan explained that this was a case management
discussion in a ‘simple procedure’ case. Simple procedure is where the value of a
case is to a maximum of £5,000. Anything above that would fall into Ordinary Cause
with the resultant increase in expenses for the losing party.
Although I am not permitted to disclose the identity of the parties to this action,
Ahsan was representing the ‘claimant’ which means the party bringing the action.
The defender is known as the ‘respond’. Ahsan likened civil litigation to a chess
match where the claimant is the white pieces and moves first and has the job of
setting the tone. If done right, the claimant can set the narrative and force the
respondent to make admissions and also found on any omissions. Once the opening
gambit was launched, however, both parties were on an equal footing and Ahsan
explained the concept of fair notice in Scots Law. This means that no party is entitled
to ambush another party at a proof as both parties will know each other’s position
and what they are required to prove and defend against. This was more pronounced
in ordinary cause rather than simple procedure. Apparently, far more technical
expertise was needed in ordinary cause. In theory, a party litigant could represent
themselves in ordinary cause but this would not be sensible and a person should
always instruct a qualified solicitor. Even simple procedure was not ‘simple’ but this
was a story for another day.
Ahsan recommended that I borrow the 4th edition of MacPhail’s Sheriff Court Practice
from the law library and read about the correct way to frame pleadings, which will aid
my understanding of the civil litigation process. Ahsan also recommended reviewing
McBryde’s Law of Contract and Gloag on Contract. Ahsan was consistently trying to impart information to me in context along so that I could understand how theory and practice were interconnected. This is something that I really appreciated and this would make my transition into practice much smoother and would make me better prepared for the diploma.
Once we reached the court room, there were several solicitors, witnesses and clients waiting outside. Ahsan explained that they were waiting for family cases and the ‘crowd’ included social work and medical professionals.
We sat in a client consultation room and Ahsan explained what the case is about. This was a case which was paused last year whilst awaiting the Inner House of the Court of Session decision in Cabot Financial (UK) Limited v Ryan Bell, XA4/23.
The issue in Ryan Bell was whether proof of receipt, i.e. a track and trace printout from the Royal Mail website was required when serving confirmation of formal service of a claim form. The issue in the present case was that the court had requested proof of failure of postal delivery before they would process the ‘application for a decision’ on the basis of Sheriff Officer re-service. Ahsan explained that the ordinary cause equivalent of an ‘application for a decision’ was a ‘Minute for Decree’, which means asking the court to award the case in your client’s favour.
Ahsan gave me a copy of the Inner House decision which ruled that Royal Mail track
and trace was not required and also gave me a copy of Part 18 of the Simple Procedure Rules which related to ‘Formal Service’. Ahsan recommended that I read these two documents in my own time and this would also give me an understanding of the ‘presumption of delivery’ in Scots Law.
The Clerk of Court unlocked the courtroom and then the Sheriff entered the courtroom and we all had to stand. Ahsan introduced himself to the court, but he was known by the Sheriff due to previous appearances. Ahsan asked permission for me to observe proceedings, and the Sheriff very kindly agreed. Ahsan made his ‘submissions’ and the Sheriff agreed with him and accepted Ahsan’s application for a decision. When Ahsan moved for expenses, the Sheriff wanted to restrict these in accordance with the statutory cap on expenses of 10% on claims between £1,501 to £3,000. Ahsan submitted that this would not include outlays and asked for an increased award of expenses, giving reasoning as to why this should be awarded. The Sheriff said he wanted Ahsan to lodge written submissions in advance of a further expenses hearing in June 2024.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the Sheriff had a chat with me and asked about my dissertation, where I studied and what type of law I was planning to practice. This was a very pleasant conversation and I felt that the court staff and the Sheriff were very supportive of me as a law student and wanted me to get the most out of the experience.
Ahsan and I had a quick debrief and he advised that I make notes on the case and my own observations when I got home and while the information was fresh in my mind.
I met Ahsan the following day at 9:30am in the foyer of the court again. This time there was a Legal Debate. Ahsan was representing a building and construction company who was suing for an update bill. Ahsan explained that this was an ordinary action as the value was over £5,000 and this was a debate on the defender’s ‘pleas in law’. The defender was trying to have the pursuer’s case thrown out and Ahsan was arguing that the case be assigned to a proof, i.e a hearing of evidence with witness testimonies.
Once again, we went to the civil office where the court staff advised us which court the debate would take place in. We met the opposing solicitor who was a very nice lady and the Clerk of the Court was very accommodating.
The Sheriff entered the courtroom and we all stood up. The Sheriff was more than happy for me to stay and watch the proceedings. As this was the defender’s debate, the defender’s solicitor opened up and went through the facts and the law and why the case should be dismissed. The defender’s solicitor said that there was no ‘averment’ of hours worked.
Ahsan did not interrupt but quietly sat there and made notes about what the defender’s solicitor was saying.
When the defender’s solicitor had finished, Ahsan got up and started making his submissions. Ahsan went into a lot of detail about the principles of contract law and how they applied in this case. Ahsan talked about a concept which I had heard in lectures but I got to find out what this meant in practical terms. This was quantum meruit, which means that even if a price has not been agreed beforehand, the court can imply a reasonable price. Ahsan referred to some cases such as Avintair, Eurocopy and also Martin Bisset Bald. In relation to the absence of hours worked averment, Ahsan said that was a very simple calculation which was in both the defender’s and judicial knowledge. All the defender had to do was divide the total price by £40 per hour.
I noticed that both solicitors were very polite to each other but at the same time, they
were critical of each other’s position. Ahsan later explained that this was all part of the adversarial court system in Scotland. After the hearing, Ahsan, myself and the defender’s solicitor had a very pleasant chat in the solicitor’s robing room. Ahsan was very complimentary of the defender’s solicitor’s experience and skill and was said that he had a very good professional working relationship with her and she agreed.
Ahsan was very deferential to his opponent outside the courtroom, but very assertive
while advocating. They both got on really well and this made me realise that you can be an adversarial solicitor advocating strongly for your client, but at the same time have a pleasant professional relationship with your opponent. It is maybe too simplistic to say that this strengthened my desire to start my Diploma in Legal Practice and commence a traineeship as soon as possible. This is a collegiate profession I would be very proud to be a part of.
The defender’s solicitor had a nice conversation with me and gave me a lot of
encouragement. I felt very motivated and spirited after my chat with her and she
gave me good advice as to which areas of law to look at and what to focus on during
After the hearing, Ahsan and I had a quick debrief and Ahsan advised me to look into quantum meruit and recommended some cases to read. I was interested to hear that the Sheriff was Ahsan’s tutor in the civil litigation course during his Diploma in Legal Practice, some 14 years ago!
I was due to attend another Legal Debate with Ahsan in Edinburgh the following week, but this was called off the day before and was ‘sisted’ which means paused, for settlement. I was disappointed as this debate would include discussions about the applicability of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, specification and relevance of pleadings. However, I have heard settlement is always better than litigation, so maybe it was a good thing from the parties point of view.
I feel that I am more prepared for the Diploma in Legal Practice now after my work
experience and would be looking beyond that now that I know what day to day court practice would look like. I feel that I would be looking at case law differently after shadowing Ahsan. I learned that the dry text on paper was actually once pulsating with life, tired eyes, pages upon pages of written submission, scored out and re-written, red-penned and highlighted lists of authorities, anxiety before the hearing, relief after the hearing, long hours of advocacy, client expectations, and real life issues which have significant impact on businesses, lives and the economy. Ahsan ensured that I left the experience with far more knowledge and a deeper insight than I came with.
I would welcome any traineeship opportunities. Please contact me if you think we would be a good fit and I would be available to attend an interview or even have an informal chat. My email address is: 2439189@dundee.ac.uk
By Madiha Waseem
4th year LLB student at Dundee School of Law
You can connect with Madiha via Linkedin here.
The Scottish Lawyer has created a FREE templates especially geared towards LLB law students to assist you with drafting case notes/briefings and note taking in tutorials - click here to access the materials via our website and download your own templates now.
You can find more information about studying the LLB in Scotland and the routes to becoming a qualified solicitor on the Law Society of Scotland's website.
Views expressed in guest posts are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Scottish Lawyer.
The copyright of this work (other than credit provided above) is owned by The Scottish Lawyer. Please do not republish this work without permission. If you wish to re-post this work either in whole or in part, please contact thescottishlawyer.nadiacook@gmail.com
Commentaires